She deserved it. He'd given her everything, and she threw it away for a thorn, a thorn that dug into her own heart and killed her. He'd laid out the terms of the agreement, so simple, so easy, and this was justice. She must die. She'd known it all along, and it was just.
They were perfect, father and son. They were, and were together, from forever, and the being of all was from them. Out of love and for glory they made her, holding dirt together and making it like God. What dirt would have imagined such a fate? But she spit in his face.
He didn't need her. He was enough, and she was just an expression, only a little echo, and now an enemy, futile and wicked. Walking, breathing mud bent on rebellion, hurtling blind toward the promised wages of her evil labor, utterly empty, unnecessary.
So where was justice? Where was the analysis, the careful weighing of costs against benefits? Where was the easy, obvious decision to let the suicidal monster have its way, to rid the world of its corruption, to begin again? Where was it? It was not.
She said he was crazy, she railed against him and ridiculed him, didn't believe it. Who would do that? she scoffed. It would be mad, it's not worth it, doesn't make sense. Who would do it? He would know better. He, more than anyone, would know better.
But she didn't know. It was true. Together they agreed, and eternal holiness came down, sent by love and rejoicing to come - made himself into dirt, meekly laid himself down under her knife. He took it all, the agony of abandonment, the forever death, every last drop of justice he drank in and bled out - and died.
And she was free. The bitter depths of justice were empty, and only mercy was left, shocking mercy and grace un-looked for. And the vastness of the mystery - that this was the new justice, turned on its head yet unbroken - and somehow, life was now hers by right.
He died and yet lived, and so did she. But why? Why? Staggered by overwhelming love, she didn't find an explanation, couldn't begin to understand. Eternity lay before her, wide and free, joy beyond imagination. How could it be?
He died and yet lived, and so did she. But why? Why? Staggered by overwhelming love, she didn't find an explanation, couldn't begin to understand. Eternity lay before her, wide and free, joy beyond imagination. How could it be?
Could it be answered? What could she give back that was enough? Perhaps a careful life, conservative and calculating, hesitating, holding back, mistrusting. Heaven forbid! She wouldn't dare. How could anything he asked for be too much?
And she laid herself down at his feet, undone by - and raised again for - and called to - crazy, glorious, unreasonable love.
4 comments:
Love it in general.
Why is justice empty, though? I think it's infinitely better than that. Justice turns upside down, and starts demanding that you get treated according to what He Himself deserves.
And maybe a sequel about how "what God gets out of it" is the glory of His Son. That every little faithfulness--no matter how little--shows how marvelous a Savior is Jesus, who could take so rotten a thing as you and produce faithfulness. Little? Sure, quantitatively speaking. And mixed with enough remaining filth so as to need His blood to cover even your faithfulness. But it is REAL faithfulness, and it brings glory to Him!
Of course, He also gets glorified as a Patient Groom, who keeps washing and washing and washing and never grows tired, never embittered, never irritated with this Bride that takes seemingly forever to clean. And so even your failings, as a Christian, display such a dazzling glory of your Savior.
And finally, He shall be displayed all the more as glorious when you appear at the last blameless, spotless, blemishless--dazzlingly arrayed in His own glory.
I agree that grace is irrational, illogical. And especially in poetry, you don't have to tell the whole story every time. I love that the poem leaves us hanging upon the illogic of it all by not rounding out this great detail of how God would actually be wrong to save if it didn't glorify Christ so very much to save and bear with sinners.
But if you ever do revise this, I hope to see something better happen to justice than merely getting emptied.
You are a swift commenter, and you're absolutely right. :) It's true that you can't include every aspect of a topic every time, or you'd never get to the end of the first post - but I think your suggested revision was a good and necessary one, so I did alter it slightly. Maybe later I'll be able to come up with a better way to work it in ... but for now, at least the idea is there. Thanks for your feedback!
Have you read any Walter Wangeran? Your writing reminds me of his. Thank you for sharing your gifts and your heart with us. :)
I don't think I have (a month later she finally wrote) - but I'll have to look him up now. :) Thanks!
Post a Comment